EDITORIAL REVIEW POLICY

• The Review follows a three-stage double-blind peer review process. The three stages of the review, although time-consuming, ensure a thorough review of the content of the manuscripts that are selected for publication.
• The Review does not entertain any requests made to convey its decision or suggestions in relation to a manuscript on the basis of submission of an abstract, a proposed outline of the manuscript or on any other bases. The decision to accept or reject a manuscript will betaken only after the manuscript has been submitted, and review of the said manuscript has been completed.
• Manuscripts may be returned to the author(s) with suggestions related to substance and/or style. Final acceptance of a manuscript for publication is contingent on the incorporation of such suggestions to the satisfaction of the Editorial Board.
• The Review reserves the right to request for copies of the resources or authorities as cited by the author(s) in the manuscript.
• The Review retains absolute discretion with respect to acceptance or rejection of the submissions made.

Review Stages

Stage 1 – This Stage will be handled by the Associate editors of the Journal to Validate the Plagiarism Level and Text Similarities Checks, Submission Rules Check, Grammar and Reference Section Checks of the Research Article. If any Author fails to compile the Submission Rules, it will be returned (May Not Rejected) to the Authors to eradicate the errors. Selected Research Articles from the Stage 1 will be bagged by a Unique Identification Number, i.e V2I54. Publisher Only Know the details of the author. Associate Editors will remove all identification Details from the Manuscript.

Stage 2 – Stage 1 Cleared papers will be shared with the editorial members randomly in the double blind Review method. The Research Paper will be evaluated with minimum Five Editorial Members including Editor-In-Chief. The Paper will be evaluated with the marking scale. The Scale is “Proper and Articulate Analysis – 15 marks, Extent and Use of Research – 10 marks, Contemporary Societal Reflections – 15 marks, New Ideas – 15 marks, Strength of the Research – 15 marks, Clarity and Organization – 10 marks, Grammar and Style – 10 marks, Correct format and Citation style – 10 marks and TOTAL – 100 marks. Research Article Will be selected for Stage 3 when that article will score Minimum 80% (Overall Editorial members Scores) in the Stage 2.

Stage 3 – This Stage will be the Editor-in-Chief Stage. The Editor-in-Chief will re-review the selected articles from stage 2. The Editor-in-Chief will finalize the papers for the Publication. After the Confirmation of the Editor-In-Chief, Authors will be notified for the Selection/Rejection Confirmation.